DomainValue
Menu

Market data

TLD policy & the aftermarket

The buyer-matched hierarchy that governs TLD choice, and the ground-truth numbers on buying a taken name.

The policy note

SUPERSEDES the old ".com-only forever" rule (relaxed 2026-08-27): .com fell to ~46% of YC startups and Placek calls .com just an area code. The NAME-quality bar (gate 0) is unchanged — this governs ONLY the TLD once a great name exists, and it is BUYER-MATCHED.

Ranked whitelist

In order of preference, once a great name exists.

#TLDPosition
1.comThe DEFAULT for any brand — plurality, highest type-in trust.
2<name>qualifier.comStrong second (get<name>.com / <name>hq.com).
3.aiFor an AI-native brand — serious AI companies ship and stay on .ai.
4.ioDev-only.
5.coWeak.

Blacklist

Never these, as a brand.

.xyz.org.netnovelty TLDs as a brand

Evidence

The aftermarket price distribution

Ground truth from recorded sales, not asking prices.

GROUND TRUTH = Bishopi's 480,667 .com sales Jan-2024 → May-2026 ($491M): 99.4% of ALL .com sales close UNDER $10,000. Distribution: <$100 = 31% (median $57) · $100-999 = 56% (median $255) · $1k-9,999 = 12% (median $1,975) · $10k-99k = 0.6% (median $15,508) · $100k+ = 0.04%. A decent one-word brandable .com realistically trades LOW-TO-MID FOUR FIGURES.

The buying playbook